Eksklusi, Kesadaran Kolektif, dan Strategi Masyarakat dalam Menghadapi Konflik Agraria (Kasus: Desa Pundenrejo, Kec. Tayu, Kab. Pati, Jawa Tengah)

Abstract

Konflik agraria antara petani Desa Pundenrejo, Kecamatan Tayu, Kabupaten Pati dengan PT Laju Perdana Indah telah berlangsung sejak era kolonial hingga kini tanpa penyelesaian. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis proses terjadinya konflik agraria, bentuk-bentuk eksklusi, tingkat kesadaran kolektif masyarakat, pengaruh eksklusi terhadap kesadaran kolektif, serta respon dan strategi masyarakat dalam menghadapi konflik tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif didukung data kualitatif melalui survei dengan kuesioner terhadap 88 responden dan wawancara mendalam kepada pengurus inti GERMAPUN. Data dianalisis menggunakan regresi logistik ordinal. Hasil menunjukkan mayoritas responden (76.14%) berada pada tingkat kesadaran kritis. Berdasarkan kerangka power of exclusion, Regulasi dan pasar berpengaruh negatif terhadap peluang kesadaran kritis, sementara legitimasi dan pemaksaan berpengaruh positif. Masyarakat merespons konflik melalui tindakan kolektif terorganisir, mobilisasi hukum serta jejaring solidaritas lintas komunitas.

The agrarian conflict between the farmer of Pundenrejo Village, Tayu Subdistrict, Pati Regency, and PT Laju Perdana Indah has persisted since the colonial era the present without just resolution. This study aims to analyze the process of agrarian conflict, the forms of exclusion experienced, the community’s level of collective consciousness, the influence of exclusion on collective consciousness, and the community’s responses and strategies in facing the conflict. The study employed a quantiative approach supported by qualitative data by conducting a survey using questionnaires on 88 respondents and in-depth interviews to the key organization of GERMAPUN. The data were analyzed using ordinal logistic regression. Result show that most respondents (76.14%) exhibited critical consciousness. Based on the power of exclusion framework, Regulation and market negatively affected te odds of critical consciousness, whereas legitimation and force affected it positively. The community responded through organized collective action, legal mobilization, and cross-community solidarity networks.