| dc.description.abstract | The objective of this research is to alaysis out income comparison and implementation between partnership and non-partnership Caisin farmer. Sub-district Megamendung decided to be an area for research due to this region can served enough data for Caisin as a primer comodity, supported by its geographical condition which suitable for plant growth. Primer and secunder data used as a method for determine this case. Sampling method did in 3 ways. Result showed that average income of total cost for each hectare is Rp 16,246,356 for partnership farmer while non-partnership farmer have Rp 10,775,454 as average income. Comparison result between partnership and non-partnership caisin farmer use R/C ratio was 2.53 for partnership farmer and 2.03 for non-partnership farmer, same for ratio of total cost. This matter showed that income for each unit cost used for partnership farmer higher than non-partnership farmer. Same condition for R/C ratio of total cost. We can conclude that farming did by partnership, nor non-partnership was profitable. But, partnership farming was more profitable due to R/C ratio higher than non-partnership farming. It shows partnership farming is more efficient than farming did by non-partnership farmer. Based on farming cost calculation, partnership can increase caisin farmer income. Throughout of all this partnership and non-partnership matter, profit got by partnership farmer bigger than the other one. Not only cost, but also buliding and controlling in maintenance period which did by company to efficiently production input for maximum result. | en |
