Kelayakan Usaha Rumahan Ikan Lele Mutiara di Galindo Teras Lele Banyuurip Kabupaten Purworejo
Date
2025Author
AMALIA, NANDA
Krisnamurthi, Y. Bayu
Burhani, Al-May Abyan Izzy
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Ikan lele adalah salah satu bahan pangan bergizi yang mudah dibudidayakan, termasuk dalam skala rumahan. Galindo Teras Lele adalah salah satu tempat budidaya pembesaran ikan lele dengan skala rumahan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis kelayakan usaha budidaya lele, switching value terhadap penurunan harga jual dan kenaikan harga pakan, serta merumuskan rekomendasi strategis untuk keberlanjutan usaha. Metode yang digunakan adalah analisis kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Penelitian ini menggunakan 2 skenario biaya investasi, yaitu skenario 1 dengan lahan dan motor sedangkan skenario 2 tidak ada lahan dan motor tetapi ada biaya sewa lahan di biaya tetap. Hasil analisis kedua skenario sama, yaitu usaha layak dijalankan berdasarkan kriteria NPV, Net B/C, IRR dan Payback Period. Aspek nonfinansial yang diteliti, yaitu aspek pasar, aspek teknis, aspek sosial dan ekonomi, serta aspek lingkungan. Analisis switching value, yaitu penurunan harga jual sebesar 4,77% dan 4,63% serta kenaikan harga pakan sebesar 10,12% dan 9,81%. Rekomendasi berupa memperluas target pasar dan diversifikasi produk dapat dilakukan untuk meningkatkan penerimaan. Catfish is a nutritious and easily cultivated food source, even on a household scale. Galindo Teras Lele is a home-scale catfish farming operation. The objective of this research is to analyze the business feasibility of catfish cultivation, determine the switching value in response to a decrease in the selling price and an increase in feed costs, and formulate strategic recommendations for business sustainability. The methodology employs both quantitative and qualitative analysis. This study uses two scenarios for investment costs: Scenario 1 includes land and a motorcycle, while Scenario 2 excludes land and a motorcycle, incorporating land rental costs into the fixed expenses. The analysis results from both scenarios are consistent, indicating that the business is financially feasible based on the NPV, Net B/C, IRR, and Payback Period criteria. The non-financial aspects examined include the market, technical, social, economic, and environmental factors. The switching value analysis revealed that a decrease in the selling price by 4.77% and 4.63%, and an increase in feed costs by 10.12% and 9.81%, would render the business unfeasible. Recommendations such as expanding the target market and diversifying products can be implemented to increase revenue.
Collections
- UT - Agribusiness [4765]
