Analisis Kelayakan Ekonomi Refused Derived Fuel dan Peuyeumisasi serta Strategi Pengelolaan TPST PUSPA Jelekong Kabupaten Bandung

Abstract

Permasalahan sampah di Kabupaten Bandung terus meningkat seiring dengan pertumbuhan jumlah penduduk dan aktivitas ekonomi, sehingga memerlukan sistem pengelolaan sampah yang lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan. Salah satu upaya yang dilakukan pemerintah daerah adalah pengembangan Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Terpadu Pusat Edukasi Pengelolaan Sampah (TPST PUSPA) Jelekong dengan pengolahan sampah bernilai tambah berupa produk Refused Derived Fuel (RDF). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kelayakan ekonomi pengolahan sampah menjadi RDF dengan menggunakan pendekatan teknologi RDF dan peuyeumisasi, serta merumuskan strategi pengembangan pengelolaan TPST PUSPA Jelekong agar berkelanjutan dan optimal. Metode analisis yang digunakan meliputi Extended Cost Benefit Analysis (eCBA) serta Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kedua pendekatan tidak layak secara finansial, namun layak secara ekonomi, dengan teknologi RDF menghasilkan NPV Rp9.995.820.442; net B/C 1,59; gross B/C 1,20; dan IRR 14,45%, sedangkan peuyeumisasi menghasilkan Rp17.789.483.686; net B/C 2,41; gross B/C 1,79; dan IRR 24,15%, yang secara konsisten lebih tinggi. Hasil analisis strategi menunjukkan partisipasi dan kesadaran masyarakat menjadi elemen kunci keberhasilan sistem pengelolaan sampah menjadi RDF dengan outcome peningkatan kapasitas dan daya tampung sampah.

The problem of waste in Bandung Regency continues to increase along with population growth and economic activity, thereby requiring a more effective and sustainable waste management system. One of the efforts made by the local government is the development of the Integrated Waste Processing Site and Waste Management Education Center (TPST PUSPA) Jelekong, which processes waste into a value-added product in the form of Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF). This study aims to analyze the economic feasibility of processing waste into RDF using the RDF and peuyeumisasi technology approaches, as well as to formulate a development strategy for the management of TPST PUSPA Jelekong to ensure its sustainability and optimal performance. The analytical methods used include Extended Cost Benefit Analysis (eCBA) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM). The results show that both approaches are not financially feasible, but are economically feasible, with RDF technology generating an NPV of IDR 9,995,820,442; a net B/C of 1.59; a gross B/C of 1.20; and an IRR of 14.45%, while peuyeumisasi generates an NPV of IDR 17,789,483,686; a net B/C of 2.41; a gross B/C of 1.79; and an IRR of 24.15%, which are consistently higher. The strategic analysis results show that community participation and awareness are key elements for the success of the waste-to-RDF management system, with outcomes of increased waste processing capacity and storage capacity.