Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRatnawati, Beata
dc.contributor.advisorDellarosa, Luvy
dc.contributor.authorhayati, Mir'atil
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-14T05:47:09Z
dc.date.available2026-08-14T05:47:09Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/178704
dc.description.abstractPenelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi kondisi eksisting, menganalisis permasalahan, serta merumuskan strategi optimasi TPS 3R di Kota Bogor dari aspek teknis dan non-teknis. Penelitian dilaksanakan pada April 2026 di tiga TPS 3R: Ciparigi 2, Taman Sari Persada, dan Kencana Permai. Metode yang digunakan meliputi observasi lapangan, wawancara, studi dokumen, penilaian kinerja berbasis scoring, analisis mass balance, dan analisis finansial sederhana. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan penilaian kinerja, TPS 3R Ciparigi 2 memperoleh Nilai Relatif 2,16, TPS 3R Taman Sari Persada 2,24, dan TPS 3R Kencana Permai 2,66 dari skala 20. Mengacu pada Petunjuk Teknis TPS 3R 2017, Nilai Relatif = 9,5 termasuk kategori "Buruk", sehingga ketiga TPS 3R berstatus "Buruk". TPS 3R Kencana Permai terpilih sebagai model dengan proporsi reduksi tertinggi (79,1%) dan kelembagaan paling kuat. Permasalahan kritis meliputi rendahnya pemilahan dari sumber, mesin pencacah tidak optimal, dan rendahnya pendapatan hasil olahan. Strategi optimasi mencakup sosialisasi pemilahan dari sumber, perbaikan mesin pencacah, pengadaan APD, pengaktifan bank sampah, serta penguatan pembinaan DLH terjadwal.
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to identify existing conditions, analyze problems, and formulate optimization strategies for 3R Waste Processing Facilities in Bogor City. The research was conducted in April 2026 at three facilities: Ciparigi 2, Taman Sari Persada, and Kencana Permai. Methods included field observation, interviews, document studies, scoring-based performance assessment, mass balance analysis, and simple financial analysis. The results showed that Ciparigi 2 obtained a Relative Value of 2.16, Taman Sari Persada 2.24, and Kencana Permai 2.66 out of a maximum score of 20. Referring to the 2017 Technical Guidelines, a Relative Value of = 9.5 is classified as "Poor", therefore all three facilities were classified as "Poor". Kencana Permai was selected as a model with the highest reduction rate (79.1%) and strongest institutional capacity. Critical problems include low source separation, non-optimal chopper machines, and low revenue from processed products. Optimization strategies include source separation socialization, chopper machine repair, PPE provision, waste bank activation, and strengthening scheduled technical guidance.
dc.description.sponsorship
dc.language.isoid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titleOptimalisasi Tempat Pengolahan Sampah Berbasis Reduce, Reuse dan Recycle di Kota Bogorid
dc.title.alternativeOptimization of Waste Treatment Facilities Based on Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle in Bogor City
dc.typeTugas Akhir
dc.subject.keyword3r waste processing facilityid
dc.subject.keywordmass balanceid
dc.subject.keywordTPS 3R performance and evaluationid
dc.subject.keywordTPS 3R evaluationid
dc.subject.keywordwaste management strategyid
dc.subject.keywordwaste reductionid
dc.subtypeCase Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record