Analisis Pendapatan dan Faktor-Faktor Adopsi Usahatani Padi Varietas Ciherang dan Inpari 32 (Studi Kasus: Desa Ketawangrejo, Kecamatan Grabag, Kabupaten Purworejo).

Abstract

Produksi padi di Indonesia menghadapi berbagai tantangan, antara lain perubahan iklim, keterbatasan sumber daya lahan, serta belum optimalnya pemanfaatan varietas unggul di tingkat petani. Salah satu upaya peningkatan produktivitas dilakukan melalui penggunaan varietas unggul seperti Inpari 32. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pendapatan usahatani, perbedaan kinerja usahatani serta faktor-faktor penentu yang memengaruhi adopsi Inpari 32 di Desa Ketawangrejo. Penelitian menggunakan data primer dari 72 petani yang terdiri atas 42 petani Ciherang dan 30 petani Inpari 32. Analisis dilakukan menggunakan analisis pendapatan usahatani, uji beda Mann–Whitney U Test, serta regresi logistik biner. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa usahatani padi varietas Inpari 32 memiliki rata-rata penerimaan, pendapatan, dan nilai R/C ratio yang lebih tinggi dibandingkan Ciherang. Nilai R/C ratio Inpari 32 sebesar 2,18, sedangkan Ciherang sebesar 1,87. Hasil uji beda perbedaan signifikan pada produktivitas, penerimaan, dan pendapatan, sedangkan total biaya dan R/C ratio tidak berbeda nyata. Faktor yang meningkatkan peluang adopsi Inpari 32 adalah pendapatan atas biaya total dan partisipasi pelatihan. Sebaliknya usia dan status kepemilikan lahan menjadi faktor yang menurunkan peluang adopsi Inpari 32. Adapun variabel lama pendidikan, luas lahan, intensitas penyuluhan, keikutsertaan kelompok tani, dan biaya pestisida tidak berpengaruh nyata.

Rice production in Indonesia faces various challenges, including climate change, limited land resources, and the suboptimal utilization of improved rice varieties at the farm level. One strategy to enhance rice productivity is the adoption of improved varieties such as Inpari 32. This study aimed to analyze farm income, compare the performance of rice farming, and identify the factors influencing the adoption of Inpari 32 in Ketawangrejo Village. Primary data were collected from 72 farmers, consisting of 42 Ciherang farmers and 30 Inpari 32 farmers. The data were analyzed using farm income analysis, the Mann–Whitney U test, and binary logistik regression. The results showed that Inpari 32 farming generated higher average revenue, income, and farming efficiency than Ciherang farming. The R/C ratio of Inpari 32 was 2.18, while that of Ciherang was 1.87. The Mann–Whitney U test indicated significant differences in productivity, revenue, and income between the two varieties, whereas total production cost and R/C ratio did not differ significantly. Factors that increased the likelihood of adopting Inpari 32 were farm income and participation in agricultural training. In contrast, farmers' age and land tenure status reduced the likelihood of adopting Inpari 32. Meanwhile, years of education, farm size, extension intensity, farmer group membership, and pesticide costs had no significant effect on the adoption of Inpari 32.