| dc.contributor.advisor | Setiawaty, Berlian | |
| dc.contributor.author | YUDIKA, NINDYA MAHARANI PUTRI | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-06-15T23:31:14Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2026-06-15T23:31:14Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2026 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/173433 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Manajemen risiko keuangan pada perusahaan asuransi merupakan salah satu aspek penting dalam menentukan cadangan modal guna menjaga keberlanjutan perusahaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan ukuran risiko Value at Risk (VaR), Tail Value at Risk (TVaR), dan Range Value at Risk (RVaR) pada data klaim asuransi public liability. Metode yang digunakan adalah pemodelan data klaim menggunakan distribusi lognormal, log-logistik, dan beta-prime, dilanjutkan dengan uji rasio fungsi survival untuk menentukan ketebalan ekor distribusi. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa distribusi beta-prime memiliki ekor paling berat, sehingga memberikan estimasi yang paling konservatif bagi perusahaan. Namun pada distribusi tersebut, nilai TVaR menjadi tidak terdefinisi, sementara RVaR mampu memberikan estimasi risiko yang lebih stabil pada interval tingkat kepercayaan tertentu. Pendekatan ini memberikan wawasan baru mengenai penggunaan RVaR bagi perusahaan sebagai ukuran risiko yang lebih unggul dalam menghadapi risiko klaim ekstrem. | |
| dc.description.abstract | Financial risk management in insurance companies plays a crucial role in maintaining corporate’s sustainability and determining adequate capital reserves. This study aims to compare the risk measures Value at Risk (VaR), Tail Value at Risk (TVaR), and Range Value at Risk (RVaR) using public liability insurance claim data. The analysis involves modeling the claim data using the lognormal, log-logistic, and beta-prime distributions, followed by a survival function ratio test to evaluate the heaviness of the distribution tails. The results indicate that the beta prime distribution exhibits heaviest tail behavior, thereby providing the most conservative risk for the company. However, within this distribution, the TVaR measure may yield undefined values, whereas RVaR emerges as an alternative risk measure because it provides more stable estimates within specific confidence intervals. These findings offer new insights into the application of RVaR as a more robust risk measure for managing extreme claim risks in insurance companies. | |
| dc.description.sponsorship | | |
| dc.language.iso | id | |
| dc.publisher | IPB University | id |
| dc.title | Perbandingan Ukuran Risiko Value at Risk, Tail Value at Risk, dan Range Value at Risk | id |
| dc.title.alternative | A Comparative Analysis of Value at Risk, Tail Value at Risk, and Range Value at Risk Measures | |
| dc.type | Skripsi | |
| dc.subject.keyword | beta-prime | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | heavy-tailed distribution | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | RVaR (Range Value at Risk) | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tail Value at Risk (TVaR) | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | Value at Risk (VaR) | id |