View Item 
      •   IPB Repository
      • Dissertations and Theses
      • Undergraduate Theses
      • UT - Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
      • UT - Statistics and Data Sciences
      • View Item
      •   IPB Repository
      • Dissertations and Theses
      • Undergraduate Theses
      • UT - Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
      • UT - Statistics and Data Sciences
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Forecasting of Time Series Data Using Support Vector Resgression based on Kernel Types

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      Cover (925.3Kb)
      Fulltext (1.148Mb)
      Date
      2016-06-22
      Author
      Nida, Oktarina Safar
      Saefuddin, Asep
      Wijayanto, Hari
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Support vector regression (SVR) is a nonlinear method that uses the principle of risk minimization. SVR model uses the kernel function with regularization constant (C and ε). The kernel function which is commonly used in the SVR are linear, polynomial and radial basis function (RBF). Determination of kernel with its constants is required in SVR model. Grid search algorithm determines the best regularization constant combination based on the smallest error rate. SVR is able to replace the case of linear regression and forecasting. The accuracy of forecasting is very important. The type of time series data is divided into several models, i.e. constant, trend, polynomial, and seasonal model. The study simulated various model of time series data using SVR. Model that had been tested was evaluated by Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE). The simulation found that SVR model which used RBF kernel on the four types of time series data performed the best forecasting accuracy. In the application data, the RBF kernel with C of 10 and ε of 0.04 was implemented to build the SVR model. In the training data, the best SVR model produced MAE of 7.15436, RMSE of 10.03607 and MAPE of 0.86904%, while in the testing data the model produced MAE of 6.67387, RMSE of 9.41013 and MAPE of 0.865755%. Even if the testing data produced smaller error compared to training data, the difference of errors in the training and testing data was not statistically significant.
      URI
      http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/117084
      Collections
      • UT - Statistics and Data Sciences [2260]

      Copyright © 2020 Library of IPB University
      All rights reserved
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Indonesia DSpace Group 
      IPB University Scientific Repository
      UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
      Universitas Jember Digital Repository
        

       

      Browse

      All of IPB RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

      My Account

      Login

      Application

      google store

      Copyright © 2020 Library of IPB University
      All rights reserved
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Indonesia DSpace Group 
      IPB University Scientific Repository
      UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
      Universitas Jember Digital Repository