Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDewi Raswatie, Fitria
dc.contributor.advisorSehabudin, Ujang
dc.contributor.authorMufti Zilzani Hidayatullah, Qinan
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-24T06:02:43Z
dc.date.available2022-06-24T06:02:43Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-24
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/112159
dc.description.abstractthis study aims to determine the cost structure of broiler farming for close house and open house breeders, and to analyze the income of broiler farms for close house and open house breeders. The method of determining the location was determined through the purposive method, while the sampling method also used purposive judgment sampling, and the data analysis method used descriptive methods. The results showed that: (1) The largest cost structure in chicken farming is labor costs, heating/gas costs and husk costs, both based on breeders using Close House and Open House types of cages. Based on the overall that the total cost of livestock business with Close House type of cage is smaller than the cost of livestock business with Open House type of cage; (2) The income from the total cost based on the type of cage obtained by the Close House breeder is greater than that of the Open House breeder. The value of the R/C ratio over the total cost of Close House breeders is greater than that of Open House breeders, so the livestock business activities carried out by Close House breeders are more profitable than Open House breeders.id
dc.description.abstractPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui struktur biaya usaha ternak ayam ras pedaging peternak close house dan open house, dan untuk menganalisis pendapatan usaha ternak ayam ras pedaging peternak close house dan open house. Metode penentuan lokasi ditentukan melalui metode purposive, sedangkan metode penarikan sampel juga menggunakan purposive judgement sampling, dan metode analisis data menggunakan analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, bahwa: (1) Struktur biaya terbesar dalam usaha ternak ayam yaitu biaya tenaga kerja, biaya pemanas/gas dan biaya sekam baik berdasarkan peternak dengan menggunakan jenis kandang Close House maupun Open House. Secara keseluruhan bahwa total biaya usaha ternak dengan jenis kandang Close House lebih kecil dibandingkan dengan biaya usaha ternak dengan jenis kandang Open House; (2) Hasil pendapatan atas biaya total berdasarkan jenis kandang yang diperoleh peternak Close House lebih besar dibandingkan peternak Open House. Nilai rasio atas biaya total pada peternak Close House lebih besar daripada peternak Open House, maka kegiatan usaha ternak yang dilakukan peternak Close House lebih menguntungkan dibandingkan peternak Open House.id
dc.language.isoidid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titleAnalisis Pendapatan Usaha Ternak Ayam Ras tipe pedaging Pola Kemitraan di Kabupaten Sukabumi (Studi Kasus: Peternak Plasma dari PT. Multi Sarana Pakanindo).id
dc.title.alternativeAnalysis of Broiler Livestock Business Income in Sukabumi Regency (Case Study Plasma Farmers from Multi Sarana Pakanindo Ltd.)id
dc.typeUndergraduate Thesisid
dc.subject.keywordCost Structureid
dc.subject.keywordOperating Incomeid
dc.subject.keywordPartnershipid
dc.subject.keywordClose Houseid
dc.subject.keywordOpen Houseid


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record