| dc.description.abstract | The Gunung Walat Education Forest (GWEF) had been tapping of sap since 2001. The tapping began with the opening of copal. The process of tapping as a step for using the non wood forest product to generate income for GWEF. After copal, the opening of resin was found in 2007. For 10 years, GWEF had been three times turnover the management, the period were 2001-2003, 2004-2008, and 2009-now. At those periods the pattern of income, both of the revenue of management or revenue tappers were different. The method that used is benefit cost analysis and revenue of tappers analysis, presented by tabulation and explained descriptively. Selection of respondents using the purposive sampling were the tappers who had beed working in three periods of management. During three periods of management, the revenue of management was fluctuated. At 2001-2003 period Rp 54.074.963,67/year, 2004-208 is Rp 14.897.368,76/year, period of 2009-now is Rp 377.104.206,40/year. This because of efforts to increase the sap, such as stimulant gives, incentives, area management, and the incoming from sap also services as the main income for GWEF, after 2009 period. Meanwhile, the periods before 2009 there is no efforts to increase the sap because focused in other sectors as income. The appearance of resin in 2007 was able to covered management costs while copal was not able. The similar condition happened in production cost that fluctuated. The high income can made high production cost and high management cost as well. These caused by high production for high income so that the production cos was higher. The change of management cause the increase of income per year for tappers. This caused by high motivation and outpouring time when tapping. The increased of that factors caused by the efforts from management to increase sap income, such as incentives and stimulant gives that influenced to those increase, so the contribution of sap income’s tappers was increasing from beginning until now. But the increasing can not able to cover tappers’s life, so it needs another income. Meanwhile, production cost of tappers was not significantly increase because production instruments that used were relatively same, the increase was found in living costs because there were the increase of prices of life needs. | en |
