Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRosiana, Nia
dc.contributor.authorMAHARANI, RAHMALIA PUTRI
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-27T08:39:50Z
dc.date.available2026-07-27T08:39:50Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/175970
dc.description.abstractPatani Coffee merupakan UMKM pengolahan kopi di Kabupaten Bogor yang memproduksi empat jenis kopi bubuk. Dalam menghitung HPP, Patani Coffee membebankan biaya tenaga kerja langsung dan biaya overhead pabrik secara merata pada setiap produk tanpa mempertimbangkan konsumsi sumber daya dan volume produksi. Penelitian ini bertujuan membandingkan perhitungan HPP metode tradisional dengan metode Activity Based Costing (ABC), serta merancang format HPP berbasis Microsoft Excel untuk Patani Coffee. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mixed methods melalui observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi data produksi Maret 2026. Hasil menunjukkan seluruh produk mengalami overcosting pada metode tradisional, dengan selisih HPP per unit sebesar Rp22.054 untuk arabika, Rp11.221 untuk robusta, dan Rp20.268 untuk liberika dan excelsa dibandingkan metode ABC, sehingga margin keuntungan metode tradisional lebih kecil. Metode ABC dan format Excel yang dirancang dapat menjadi solusi bagi Patani Coffee untuk menghasilkan perhitungan HPP yang lebih akurat dan berkelanjutan.
dc.description.abstractPatani Coffee is an MSME engaged in coffee processing in Kabupaten Bogor that produces four types of ground coffee. In calculating COGM, Patani Coffee allocates direct labor costs and factory overhead evenly across all products without considering resource consumption and production volume. This research aims to compare the calculation of COGM under the traditional method and the Activity Based Costing (ABC) method, as well as to design a Microsoft Excel-based COGM format for Patani Coffee. This research uses a mixed methods approach through observation, interviews, and documentation of March 2026 production data. The results show that all products experienced overcosting under the traditional method, with a difference in COGM per unit of Rp22,054 for arabica, Rp11,221 for robusta, and Rp20,268 for liberica and excelsa compared to the ABC method, resulting in a smaller profit margin under the traditional method. The ABC method and the designed Excel format can serve as a solution for Patani Coffee to produce a more accurate and sustainable COGM calculation.
dc.description.sponsorship
dc.language.isoid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titlePerbandingan dan Perancangan Format Perhitungan Harga Pokok Produksi Metode Activity Based Costing pada UMKM Patani Coffeeid
dc.title.alternativeComparison and Design of a Cost of Goods Manufactured Calculation Format with the Activity Based Costing Method at Patani Coffee MSME
dc.typeTugas Akhir
dc.subject.keywordactivity based costing methodid
dc.subject.keywordcost of goods manufacturedid
dc.subject.keywordmicrosoft excelid
dc.subject.keywordtraditional methodid
dc.subtypeUndergraduate Theses


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record