Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorIndrawan, Purana
dc.contributor.authorPutra, Shadam Erika
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-16T03:06:40Z
dc.date.available2025-08-16T03:06:40Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/169619
dc.description.abstractDistribusi yang andal dan efisien sangat penting bagi kelangsungan bisnis PT XYZ, namun perusahaan menghadapi masalah keterlambatan, kerusakan barang, dan layanan pengiriman yang tidak konsisten akibat pemilihan vendor yang belum terstruktur. Penelitian ini menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) untuk menentukan prioritas kriteria dan peringkat vendor pengiriman kertas. Data diperoleh melalui observasi, wawancara, dan kuesioner kepada pihak terkait, kemudian diolah melalui penyusunan hirarki keputusan, perbandingan berpasangan, perhitungan bobot eigen vector, dan uji konsistensi (Consistency Ratio). Hasil menunjukkan bobot kriteria service (0,42), quality (0,19), cost (0,15), flexibility (0,15), dan delivery (0,08). Peringkat vendor diperoleh sebagai berikut, PT C (0,53) peringkat pertama, PT B (0,35) kedua, dan PT A (0,13) ketiga, dengan nilai CR < 0,1 yang menandakan konsistensi penilaian. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan tersebut, PT C memperoleh skor tertinggi sehingga direkomendasikan sebagai vendor utama pengiriman kertas bagi PT XYZ
dc.description.abstractReliable and efficient distribution is crucial for PT XYZ's business continuity, but the company faces issues of delays, damaged goods, and inconsistent delivery services due to unstructured vendor selection. This study used the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to prioritize criteria and rank paper delivery vendors. Data was obtained through observations, interviews, and questionnaires with relevant parties. Data were then processed through decision hierarchy construction, pairwise comparisons, eigenvector weight calculations, and consistency tests (Consistency Ratio). The results showed the weights of the criteria service (0.42), quality (0.19), cost (0.15), flexibility (0.15), and delivery (0.08). The vendor rankings were as follows: PT C (0.53) ranked first, PT B (0.35) second, and PT A (0.13) third, with a CR value <0.1, indicating consistency in the assessment. Based on these calculations, PT C received the highest score and is therefore recommended as the primary paper delivery vendor for PT XYZ.
dc.description.sponsorship
dc.language.isoid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titlePemilihan Vendor Pengiriman Kertas di PT XYZ dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Processid
dc.title.alternativeSelection of Paper Delivery Vendors at PT XYZ Using the Analytical Hierarchy Process Method
dc.typeTugas Akhir
dc.subject.keywordAnalytic Hierarchy Process (AHP)id
dc.subject.keywordDistributionid
dc.subject.keywordDelivery efficiencyid
dc.subject.keywordVendor selectionid
dc.subject.keywordVendor rankingid


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record