Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHidayati, Aulia
dc.contributor.authorPRAMESTI, ERRI PUTRI
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-18T04:13:54Z
dc.date.available2024-07-18T04:13:54Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/154109
dc.description.abstractPT ABC merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang bidang produksi pupuk dan amoniak yang menjalin hubungan kerja sama dengan Toyo Engineering Corporation (TEC). Pada saat pelaporan SPT PPN Masa Pajak Maret tahun 2018, PT ABC tidak melaporkan penerimaan bagi hasil atas transasksi license fee “ACES-21 Process” yang diterima dari TEC sebesar Rp15.847.669.350, sehingga fiskus melakukan koreksi atas transaksi tersebut. Terjadi perbedaan pedapat antara PT ABC dan fiskus mengenai objek PPN atas ekspor, sehingga PT ABC memutuskan untuk mengajukan banding. Tujuan dari penulisan proyek akhir ini adalah menguraikan proses penyelesaian sengketa pajak melalui banding di Pengadilan Pajak. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis adalah wawancara, observasi, dokumentasi, dan studi pustaka. Penulis menganalisis data menggunakan metode dekrisptif kualitatif. Hasil banding PT ABC dikabulkan seluruhnya oleh Majelis Hakim atas penelitian bukti-bukti dokumen pendukung dan tanggapan yang disampaikan oleh PT ABC.
dc.description.abstractPT ABC is a company engaged in the production of fertilizers and ammonia that has a cooperative relationship with Toyo Engineering Corporation (TEC). At the time of reporting the VAT Return for the March 2018 Tax Period, PT ABC did not report the revenue share of the license fee transaction “ACES-21 Process” received from TEC amounting to IDR 15,847,669,350, so that the tax authorities made corrections to the transaction. There was a difference of opinion between PT ABC and the tax authorities regarding the object of VAT on exports, so PT ABC decided to file an appeal. The purpose of writing this final project is to describe the process of resolving tax disputes through appeals at the Tax Court. The research methods used by the author are interviews, observation, documentation, and literature study. The author analyzes the data using the qualitative decisive method. The results of PT ABC's appeal were fully granted by the Panel of Judges based on the research of supporting document evidence and responses submitted by PT ABC.
dc.description.sponsorship
dc.language.isoid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titlePenyelesaian Sengketa Pajak PT ABC atas Banding PPN pada KKP Pratama Indomitraid
dc.title.alternativeTax Dispute Settlement of PT ABC on VAT Appeal at KKP Pratama Indomitra
dc.typeTugas Akhir
dc.subject.keywordBandingid
dc.subject.keywordBandingid
dc.subject.keywordPengadilan Pajakid
dc.subject.keywordPPNid
dc.subject.keywordSengketa Pajakid
dc.subject.keywordAppealid
dc.subject.keywordTax Courtid
dc.subject.keywordTax Disputeid
dc.subject.keywordPengadilan Pajakid
dc.subject.keywordTax Disputeid
dc.subject.keywordTax Courtid
dc.subject.keywordAppealid
dc.subject.keywordSengketa Pajakid
dc.subject.keywordPPNid
dc.subject.keywordVATid


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record