Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorSimangunsong, Bintang C. H.
dc.contributor.authorShahputra, Axelshan Zaki
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T00:31:57Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T00:31:57Z
dc.date.issued2022-03-31
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/111476
dc.description.abstractPermintaan printing and writing paper dunia terus menurun dengan berkembangnya teknologi informasi. Walaupun permintaan dunia berkurang, printing and writing paper masih menjadi produk ekspor kertas utama Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengestimasi fungsi permintaan ekspor printing and writing paper Indonesia. Estimasi dilakukan dengan teknik Panel data analysis menggunakan data dari 30 negara tujuan ekspor untuk periode tahun 2009—2019. Tiga model data panel diinvestigasi: pooled, fixed effect, dan random effect; dan kemudian dibandingkan dengan menggunakan uji Chow, Breusch-Pagan, dan Hausman. Hasil estimasi awal menunjukkan adanya autokorelasi dan heteroskedastisitas. Koreksi berhasil dilakukan untuk model pooled dan fixed effect, tetapi model random effect masih memiliki autokorelasi. Hasil uji Chow dan Breusch-Pagan menolak pooled sebagai model yang lebih baik. Hasil uji Hausman menunjukkan model fixed effect adalah model terbaik dengan elastisitas harga sebesar -0.94 dan elastisitas pendapatan sebesar 1.09 serta nilai R2 sebesar 0.96.id
dc.description.abstractDemand for printing and writing paper in the world is decreasing as information technology grows. Despite a decrease in world’s demand, the printing and writing paper is still the primary paper export products of Indonesia. This study aims to estimate Indonesia’s printing and writing paper export demand function. Estimation was done using panel data analysis technique with data from 30 export partner countries for the period 2009—2019. Three panel data models were investigated: pooled, fixed effect, and random effect models; and then compared using Chow, Breusch-Pagan, and Hausman tests. Results detected heteroscedasticity and autocorrelation. After correction, pooled and fixed effect models were suitable, but random effect model still had autocorrelation. Chow and Breusch-Pagan tests rejected pooled model as the best model. Hausman test indicated fixed effect model was the best model with price elasticity of -0.94, income elasticity of 1.09, and R2 value of 0.96.id
dc.language.isoidid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titleEstimasi Fungsi Permintaan Ekspor Printing and Writing Paper Indonesiaid
dc.title.alternativeEstimation of Indonesia's Printing and Writing Paper Export Demand Functionid
dc.typeUndergraduate Thesisid
dc.subject.keywordpanel dataid
dc.subject.keywordfixed effect modelid
dc.subject.keywordrandom effect modelid
dc.subject.keywordpooled modelid
dc.subject.keywordpaper productsid


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record