View Item 
      •   IPB Repository
      • Dissertations and Theses
      • Undergraduate Theses
      • UT - Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
      • UT - Biochemistry
      • View Item
      •   IPB Repository
      • Dissertations and Theses
      • Undergraduate Theses
      • UT - Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences
      • UT - Biochemistry
      • View Item
      JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

      Antibacterial Activity of Trigona spp. Bee Propolis From Pandeglang Against Enterobacter sakazakii.

      Thumbnail
      View/Open
      Abstract (173.3Kb)
      Full Text (411.6Kb)
      Postscript (1.382Mb)
      Cover (400.1Kb)
      Bab I (347.5Kb)
      Bab II (394.8Kb)
      Bab III (375.6Kb)
      Bab IV (404.9Kb)
      Bab V (357.8Kb)
      Daftar Pustaka (387.3Kb)
      Lampiran (818.0Kb)
      Date
      2009
      Author
      Fitriannur
      Metadata
      Show full item record
      Abstract
      Propolis has many advantages and specific potencies, due to its properties as antibacterial, antivirus, and anticancer. The characteristics and properties of E. sakazakii has been studied well due to its physiological properties and resistances in the environment. The research aim is to determine the propolis potency of Trigona spp as antibacterial agent against E. sakazakii. Propolis was extracted from bee hives of Trigona spp using maceration method with ethanol 70% (propolis extract) yielded 17,76% extract. The antibacterial activity test was performed by a modified agar well diffusion against three isolates of bacteria E. sakazakii IB-19b, IB-29a, and ATCC 35217. Through the initiation test, propolis activity was higher than commercial propolis, and lower than ampicillin. The effectivities of propolis extract to commercial propolis for each isolate IB-19b, IB-29a, and ATCC 35217 were 143,99%, 169,65%, and 155,76% respectively. The effectivities of propolis extract to ampicillin for each isolate IB-19b, IB-29a, and ATCC 35217 were 39,37%, 38,94%, and 47,37% respectively. The minimum inhibition concentration differed for each isolate, the minimum inhibition concentration for IB-19b, IB-29a, and ATCC 35217 were 12,50%, 25,00%, and 50,00% respectively. The propolis activity to each isolate showed the concentration dependent activity, the antibacterial activity decrease as the propolis concentration decrease.
      URI
      http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/12760
      Collections
      • UT - Biochemistry [1466]

      Copyright © 2020 Library of IPB University
      All rights reserved
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Indonesia DSpace Group 
      IPB University Scientific Repository
      UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
      Universitas Jember Digital Repository
        

       

      Browse

      All of IPB RepositoryCollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

      My Account

      Login

      Application

      google store

      Copyright © 2020 Library of IPB University
      All rights reserved
      Contact Us | Send Feedback
      Indonesia DSpace Group 
      IPB University Scientific Repository
      UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Institutional Repository
      Universitas Jember Digital Repository