Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/55021
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorIskandar, Budhi Hascaryo
dc.contributor.advisorSoedharma, Dedi
dc.contributor.advisorSuharsono
dc.contributor.authorGiyanto
dc.date.accessioned2012-06-21T04:29:48Z
dc.date.available2012-06-21T04:29:48Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/55021
dc.description.abstractThe study to evaluate the Underwater Photo Transect (UPT) method as an alternative method for assessing the condition of coral reefs has been conducted in Kepulauan Seribu Jakarta in August 2008. The photos were taken at every 1 m interval, along 70 m transect length placed on the substratum parallel with the coastline at 3-5 m depth. Collecting data with other two methods, namely Belt Transect (BT) and Line Intercept Transect (LIT) were also applied at the same transect with UPT method for comparison study. The comparison study among those three methods (BT, LIT and UPT) indicated that the percentage cover for all benthic and substratum (Hard Coral, Dead Scleractinia, Algae, Other Fauna and Abiotic) were not significantly different. On the contrary, the values of hard coral diversity such as the number of species (S), Shannon’s diversity index (H’) and Piellou’s eveness index (J’) were significantly different for three methods. The higher value of S and H was found when BT method was applied, but the higher value of J’ was found when LIT method was applied. MDS analysis shows that the group occured due to the station, not the method. Therefore, even though the values of hard coral diversity were different among three methods, the UPT method could be used to compare the diversity of hard coral among stations. The study on efficiency and accuracy of photo analysis indicated that the technique of selecting 10 sample random point can be used to estimate the hard coral cover, and the technique of selecting 30 sample random point can be used to estimate the coverage of all group of benthic and substratum. Both techniques use photoes with the minimun image area = (40 x 30) cm2 for each frame. If the species of hard coral was recorded, the technique of calculating the area of benthic and substrate must be done based on photoes with the minimum image area = (58 x 44) cm2 Keywords: Underwater Photo Transect, Belt Transect, Line Intercept Transect, condition of coral reefs, coral reefs, photo analysis, transect length per frame. The study on investigation the optimal of transect length indicated that treatment M (1m_1-10&21-30) was the optimal treatment to estimate the hard coral cover, and treatment C(1m_1-50m) was the optimal treatment to estimate the coverage of all group of benthic and substratum. If the species of hard coral was recorded, the treatment C can also be used for comparison study the diversity among all locations of study area. Treatment M (1m_1-10&21-30) use a (2 x 10 m) of transect length where the photoes are taken from frame-1 to frame-10, and frame-21 to frame-30. Treatment C (1m_1-50) use a 50 m of transect length where the photoes are taken from frame-1 to frame-50. The conclusion of this study is: the UPT method can be used as an alternative method for assessing the condition of coral reefs, with three option depend on the objectives of the research, and the various ability of human resources.en
dc.publisherIPB (Bogor Agricultural University)
dc.subjectUnderwater Photo Transecten
dc.subjectBelt Transecten
dc.subjectLine Intercept Transecten
dc.subjectcondition of coral reefsen
dc.subjectcoral reefsen
dc.subjectphoto analysisen
dc.subjecttransect lengthen
dc.titleEvaluasi metode transek foto bawah air untuk penilaian kondisi terumbu karangen
dc.titleEvaluation of the Underwater Photo Transect Method for Assessing the Condition of Coral Reefs
Appears in Collections:DT - Fisheries

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2010giy.pdf
  Restricted Access
Fulltext4.94 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract.pdf
  Restricted Access
Abstract317.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB I Pendahuluan.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB I457.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB II Tinjauan Pustaka.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB II557.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB III Metodologi Penelitian.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB III700.42 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB IV Perbandingan Antara Metode Transek Foto....pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB IV831.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB V Efesiensi dan Akurasi Pada....pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB V669.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB VI Optimalisasi Panjang Transek Pada....pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB VI518.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB VII Pembahasan Umum.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB VII389.15 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB VIII Kesimpulan dan Saran.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB VIII303.02 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Cover.pdf
  Restricted Access
Cover308.23 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Daftar Pustaka.pdf
  Restricted Access
Daftar Pustaka314.13 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Lampiran.pdf
  Restricted Access
Lampiran2.74 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.