Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/46508
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMa'arif, M. Syamsul
dc.contributor.advisorMarimin
dc.contributor.advisorMudikdjo, Kooswardhono
dc.contributor.advisorHardjomidjojo, Hartisari
dc.contributor.advisorIndrasti, Nastiti Siswi
dc.contributor.authorSukmawati, Anggraini
dc.date.accessioned2011-06-30T06:57:07Z
dc.date.available2011-06-30T06:57:07Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/46508
dc.description.abstractMany theories highlighted the critical importance of knowledge creation on the long-term success of the organization. However, the scarcity of empirical work on knowledge creation model has limited our understanding of the overall organizational process involved. Given the crucial role of knowledge creation in contemporary business enterprises, a fundamental question arises: what processes are facilitating knowledge creation? This study aimed to find the answer. This study investigated the interrelations among four categories of knowledge assets (experiential, conceptual, systemic, and routine) and four categories of SECI (socialization, externalization, combination, and internalization) model for knowledge creation processes. In our framework, we argued that different types of knowledge assets may have differing influences on knowledge creation. After this, we attempted a comprehensive analysis of knowledge creation model within the organization, exploring the relationship between innovation, knowledge creation model, problem-solving capability, absorptive capacity, knowledge acquisition and assets. The next step, we designed the expert system. In order to test the feasibility of this framework, we conducted an empirical research exercise. Data were collected from three dairy cooperatives in Java, Indonesia through a survey instrument. A total of 105 usable responses were analyzed. We employed canonical correlation analysis to examine the composite correlation, and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). We identified the composite effect of knowledge asset were positively contribution to knowledge creation, except systemic knowledge assets. The results revealed several contributing factors (problem-solving capability, absorptive capacity, knowledge acquisition and assets) that were significant effect to innovation. On the other hand, knowledge creation model had no significant effect to innovation in the context of the dairy cooperation in Indonesia. Product innovation was the most important innovation for Dairy Cooperatives. Design of diagnosis performance for knowledge management implementation was named Knowledge Management Scorecard for Dairy Cooperatives (KMaScD). This system was developed based on balanced scorecard concept. The application was appropriate for assesing dairy cooperatives performance dan providing a flexible evaluation framework.en
dc.publisherIPB (Bogor Agricultural University)
dc.subjectBalanced scorecarden
dc.subjectInnovationen
dc.subjectKnowledge creationen
dc.subjectProblem-solving capabilityen
dc.subjectAbsorptive capacityen
dc.subjectKnowledge assets and dairy cooperativesen
dc.titleModel penciptaan pengetahuan untuk meningkatkan keunggulan bersaing koperasi susu di Indonesiaen
dc.titleKnowledge creation model for raising competitive advantage of dairy coo-peratives in Indonesiaen
dc.date.updatedAzizah 2013-01-21 Edit: advisor, keyword
dc.subject.keywordSense making
dc.subject.keywordExplicit knowledge
Appears in Collections:DT - Agriculture Technology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
fulltext3.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Abstract_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
Abstract381.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB I Pendahuluan_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB I380.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB II Tinjauan Pustaka_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB II668.65 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB III Metodologi Penelitian_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB III525.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB IV Pengembangan Model_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB IV459.07 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB V Hasil dan Pembahasan_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB V1.01 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
BAB VI Kesimpulan_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
BAB VI355.78 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Cover_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
cover363.69 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Daftar Pustaka_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
Daftar Pustaka411.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Lampiran_ 2011asu.pdf
  Restricted Access
Lampiran1.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.