Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/43001Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Groves, Colin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-03-23T07:42:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-03-23T07:42:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/43001 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A completely new and unexpected quasi human species, Homo floresiensis, nicknamed the Hobbit, was described in 2004 from Liang Bua, a cave in Flores. Like many important new contributions to the human fossil record in the past, many commentators refused to believe that a new species had been discovered, and the type specimen was interpreted as a pathological modern human, usually as a microcephalic dwarf. There is no substance to these claims: close analysis shows that Homo floresiensis is not only a genuinely new species, but that its closest affinities lie with Plio-Pleistocene African species such as Homo habilis, so that it documents an earlier dispersal of hominins from Africa and had hitherto been suspected. | en |
| dc.publisher | IPB (Bogor Agricultural University) | |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Vol 14;No 4 | - |
| dc.title | Invited Paper The Homo floresiensis Controversy | en |
| dc.title.alternative | HAYATI Journal of Biosciences Vol. 14 No. 4 Tahun 2007 | en |
| Appears in Collections: | Hayati Journal of Biosciences | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colin Groves.pdf | e-Journal | 62.8 kB | Adobe PDF | ![]() View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
