Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/33065
Title: Comparison of Ploidy Level Screening Methods in Regenerants Derived from Anther Culture of Anthurium
Other Titles: Kongres dan Seminar Ilmiah Perhorti
Authors: Winarto, B.
Mattjik, Nurhayati Ansori
Purwito, A.
Marwoto, B.
Issue Date: 2009
Publisher: IPB (Bogor Agricultural University)
Abstract: Anther culture was successfully developed in anthurium. The anther culture resulted in morphology and growth response variation of regenerants. Different morphological variations indicated different ploidy level. Screening a convenient, rapid and reliable indirect method in ploidy level determination expected gave high benefit in estimation of ploidy level of anthurium practically. Three different ploidy levels of regenerants derived from anther culture were used in the study. Five indirect methods of chloroplast number in a stomatal guard cell, stomatal length and width ratio, stomatal density, ratio of length and width of leaves, and microspore number per anther were compared to chromosome counting as a direct method. Simple regression correlation analysis was applied to know level and direction of correlation of two methods compared. Results of the study indicate that chloroplast number in a stomatal guard cell was the most convenient and reliable indirect method in determination of ploidy level of regenerants derived from anther culture of anthurium. While number of microspores per anther was the second best method for the same purpose. Both methods was highly correlated to anthurium ploidy level with r = 0.945 and 0.813 (p<0.01), respectively. Practically application of the methods was faster than chromosome counting method. Higher number of chloroplast and microspore, higher anthurium ploidy level. Application other indirect methods were not suggested in anthurium.
URI: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/33065
Appears in Collections:Proceedings

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract PERHOTI 2009 25.docAbstract25.5 kBMicrosoft WordView/Open
Abstract PERHOTI 2009 25.pdfAbstract95.7 kBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open
Abstract PERHOTI 2009 25.psAbstract254.74 kBPostscriptView/Open
PRO2009_BWI.pdfFull text1.41 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
View/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.