Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/171988
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorYulianto, Muhamad
dc.contributor.advisorSucahyo, Lilis
dc.contributor.authorRingo, Yakobus Siringo
dc.date.accessioned2026-01-06T23:27:36Z
dc.date.available2026-01-06T23:27:36Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/171988
dc.description.abstractKetergantungan yang tinggi terhadap batu bara dan upaya transisi energi melalui co-firing biomassa menimbulkan berbagai tantangan teknis yang dapat menurunkan efisiensi pembakaran ketel uap. Selain itu, fraksi masing-masing bahan bakar dalam campuran berperan penting dalam menentukan performa pembakaran dan pengeluaran biaya produksi. Penelitian ini menganalisis kinerja pembakaran dan aspek biaya energi ketel uap tipe pipa air di Perusahaan XYZ yang menggunakan batu bara, biomassa Palm Kernel Shell (PKS), dan Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) sebagai bahan bakar. Tujuan penelitian adalah mengevaluasi efisiensi pembakaran dan dampak variasi fraksi bahan bakar terhadap efisiensi serta biaya operasional. Metode tidak langsung (indirect method) standar ASME PTC 4 digunakan untuk menghitung efisiensi dengan memperhatikan empat komponen utama kehilangan panas (L1–L4). Data operasional ketel uap periode Januari–Maret 2024. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa efisiensi ketel uap berfluktuasi antara 75,34% hingga 78,31%, dengan rata-rata 77,35%. Fluktuasi efisiensi terutama dipengaruhi oleh variasi fraksi bahan bakar yang berdampak pada kadar O2 gas buang dan suhu gas buang. Fraksi batu bara lebih dari 50% menjaga efisiensi stabil sekitar 77%, sementara fraksi PKS optimal berada pada 30–40% dengan efisiensi 77,57%. LNG berfungsi sebagai bahan bakar pendukung dan tidak signifikan memengaruhi efisiensi. Dari sisi biaya energi, biaya energi tercatat konstan pada 0,40 Rp/kkal, terlepas dari variasi efisiensi. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa strategi operasional perusahaan menekankan pada kestabilan biaya produksi, dengan komposisi bahan bakar yang seimbang untuk menjaga efisiensi teknis dan ekonomi.
dc.description.abstractThe high reliance on coal and the energy transition effort through biomass co-firing present technical challenges which can reduce steam boiler combustion efficiency. Moreover, the fraction of each fuel in the blend plays a crucial role in determining combustion performance and production cost. This study analyzes the combustion performance and energy cost aspects of a water-tube boiler at Company XYZ, which utilizes coal, Palm Kernel Shell (PKS) biomass, and Liquified Natural Gas (LNG) as fuels. The objective of this research is to evaluate boiler combustion efficiency and examine the impact of fuel fraction variations on efficiency and operating costs. The indirect method ASME PTC 4 standard was applied to calculate efficiency by considering four major heat loss components (L1–L4). Operational data are from January to March 2024. The results show that combustion efficiency fluctuated between 75,34% and 78,31%, with an average of 77,35%. These fluctuations were mainly influenced by variations in fuel fraction which affects flue gas O2 concentration and flue gas temperature. A coal fraction above 50% maintained efficiency at around 77%, while the optimum PKS fraction was found to be 30–40%, achieving the highest efficiency of 77,57%. LNG served as a supporting fuel and had no significant impact on efficiency. From energy cost perspective, the energy cost was consistently recorded at 0,40 Rp/kkal, regardless of efficiency variations. These findings indicate that the company’s operational strategy prioritizes stable production costs while maintaining a balanced fuel composition to ensure both technical efficiency and economic sustainability
dc.description.sponsorship
dc.language.isoid
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titleAnalisis Kinerja Pembakaran dan Biaya Energi Ketel Uap Berdasarkan Variabilitas Bahan Bakar Untuk Proses Produksi Pakan Ayam di Perusahaan XYZid
dc.title.alternative
dc.typeSkripsi
dc.subject.keywordbiaya energiid
dc.subject.keywordco-firingid
dc.subject.keywordefisiensiid
dc.subject.keywordketel uapid
dc.subject.keywordpembakaranid
Appears in Collections:UT - Agricultural and Biosystem Engineering

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cover_F1401211106_8c92547158c04aa9bfb1dcc05ef56272.pdfCover492.25 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
fulltext_F1401211106_3d4f3eb80f7042c482f955fb378030b5.pdf
  Restricted Access
Fulltext2.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
lampiran_F1401211106_8a26a885d8444b19b6a7fceb10501cf2.pdf
  Restricted Access
Lampiran849.98 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.