Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/165255| Title: | Analisis Penyelesaian Banding Pajak Penghasilan Badan PT CDE oleh Kantor Konsultan Pajak TaxFlash |
| Other Titles: | Settlement of Corporate Income Tax Appeal of PT CDE by TaxFlash Tax Consulting Office |
| Authors: | Tartiani, Yuni Astuti Tri Nabila, Chintya |
| Issue Date: | 2025 |
| Publisher: | IPB University |
| Abstract: | Banding merupakan proses hukum yang dilakukan oleh Wajib Pajak yang tidak puas dengan Surat Keputusan Keberatan yang dikeluarkan oleh Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (DJP). PT CDE menghadapi sengketa pajak yang dalam proses banding nya dibantu oleh Kantor Konsultan Pajak (KKP) TaxFlash. Tujuan laporan akhir ini adalah untuk memahami mekanisme KKP TaxFlash, menguraikan pelaksanaan banding ke Pengadilan Pajak, menganalisis hasil putusan banding, dan menganalisis serta memberikan rekomendasi hasil evaluasi untuk kasus pajak yang serupa. Metode pengumpulan data yang dilakukan yaitu dengan cara wawancara, dokumentasi, dan analisis dokumen. Sengketa pajak terjadi karena terdapat perbedaan pendapat antara DJP dan PT CDE. Menurut DJP uang masuk dianggap sebagai peredaran usaha dan objek Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (PPN). Sedangkan, menurut PT CDE itu pemindahbukuan dan hutang kepada pemegang saham. Hasil putusan banding juga mengabulkan seluruhnya Banding PT CDE. Selain itu, terdapat enam skema rekomendasi yang dapat diberikan untuk kasus pajak serupa. Appeal is a legal process carried out by taxpayers who are not satisfied with the Objection Decision Letter issued by the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT). PT CDE faced a tax dispute in which the appeal process was assisted by TaxFlash Tax Consultant Office (TCO). The purpose of this final report is to understand the TaxFlash TCO mechanism, describe the implementation of the appeal to the Tax Court, analyze the results of the appeal decision, and analyze and provide recommendations for evaluation results for similar tax cases. The data collection methods used are interviews, documentation, and document alaysis. The tax dispute occurred because there was a difference of opinion between the DGT and PT CDE. According to the DGT, the incoming money is considered as business circulation and Value Added Tax (VAT) object. Meanwhile, according to PT CDE, it is overbooking and debt to shareholders. The appeal verdict also fully granted PT CDE's appeal. In addition, there are six recommendation schemes that can be given for similar tax cases. |
| URI: | http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/165255 |
| Appears in Collections: | UT - Accounting |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TA_CHINTYA_NABILA_COVER.pdf | Cover | 282.29 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| TA_CHINTYA_NABILA_FULLTEXT.pdf | Fulltext | 998.36 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| TA_CHINTYA_NABILA_LAMPIRAN.pdf | Lampiran | 465.6 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.