Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/154299
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorNurdialy, Mela-
dc.contributor.authorABIGAIL-
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-19T06:39:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-19T06:39:56Z-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/154299-
dc.description.abstractPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana rekomendasi untuk menghindari perbedaan pendapat antara fiskus dengan wajib pajak atas biaya natura dan biaya yang mendukung kegiatan 3M penghasilan perusahaan dengan meninjau berdasarkan peraturan terbaru natura dan kenikmatan yaitu PMK 66 tahun 2023. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian kualitatif dengan menganalisis putusan pengadilan pajak. Pendekatan penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus dari tiga putusan pengadilan pajak. Hasil penelitian memberikan beberapa rekomendasi kepada perusahaan yang mengalami permasalahan yang serupa, diantaranya membuat daftar nominatif, melakukan pemisahan pencatatan biaya, arsip dokumentasi bukti pengeluaran perusahaan dan membuat surat ketetapan daerah terpencil bagi perusahaan yang memiliki lokasi perusahaan yang berada di daerah terpencil untuk menghindari terjadinya perbedaan pandangan atas perlakuan biaya natura dan biaya 3M.-
dc.description.abstractThis research aims to determine recommendations to avoid differences in opinion between the tax authorities and taxpayers regarding fringe benefits expenses and expenses that support the 3M activities of company income in light of the latest regulations on fringe benefits, PMK 66 of 2023. The research method used is qualitative, analyzing tax court decisions. The research approach is a case study of three tax court decisions. The results of the study provide several recommendations for companies facing similar issues, including creating a nominative list, separating the recording of costs, archiving documentation of company expenditures, and issuing a remote area determination letter for companies located in remote areas to avoid differences in views regarding the treatment of fringe benefit expenses and 3M expenses.-
dc.description.sponsorshipnull-
dc.language.isoid-
dc.publisherIPB Universityid
dc.titleTinjauan Berdasarkan PMK 66/2023 atas Tiga Putusan Pengadilan Pajak terkait Sengketa Koreksi Fiskal Positif Natura/Kenikmatanid
dc.title.alternativeReview Based on PMK 66/2023 of Three Tax Court Decisions Regarding Positive Fiscal Corrections on Fringe Benefits/Enjoyment-
dc.typeTugas Akhir-
dc.subject.keyword3M Expensesid
dc.subject.keywordSpecific Regionsid
dc.subject.keywordContract of Workid
dc.subject.keywordFringe Benefitsid
Appears in Collections:UT - Accounting

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cover_J0314201138_9edc0309d9604378834027e7d5a5a961.pdfCover2.84 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
fulltext_J0314201138_19f72ea7e0004296b03acaf1d9d0f31d.pdf
  Restricted Access
Fulltext516.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
lampiran_J0314201138_ee46e6a93c6c4b54b48851c5363b4a6b.pdf
  Restricted Access
Lampiran627.08 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.