Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/154109
Title: Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak PT ABC atas Banding PPN pada KKP Pratama Indomitra
Other Titles: Tax Dispute Settlement of PT ABC on VAT Appeal at KKP Pratama Indomitra
Authors: Hidayati, Aulia
PRAMESTI, ERRI PUTRI
Issue Date: 2024
Publisher: IPB University
Abstract: PT ABC merupakan perusahaan yang bergerak di bidang bidang produksi pupuk dan amoniak yang menjalin hubungan kerja sama dengan Toyo Engineering Corporation (TEC). Pada saat pelaporan SPT PPN Masa Pajak Maret tahun 2018, PT ABC tidak melaporkan penerimaan bagi hasil atas transasksi license fee “ACES-21 Process” yang diterima dari TEC sebesar Rp15.847.669.350, sehingga fiskus melakukan koreksi atas transaksi tersebut. Terjadi perbedaan pedapat antara PT ABC dan fiskus mengenai objek PPN atas ekspor, sehingga PT ABC memutuskan untuk mengajukan banding. Tujuan dari penulisan proyek akhir ini adalah menguraikan proses penyelesaian sengketa pajak melalui banding di Pengadilan Pajak. Adapun metode penelitian yang digunakan penulis adalah wawancara, observasi, dokumentasi, dan studi pustaka. Penulis menganalisis data menggunakan metode dekrisptif kualitatif. Hasil banding PT ABC dikabulkan seluruhnya oleh Majelis Hakim atas penelitian bukti-bukti dokumen pendukung dan tanggapan yang disampaikan oleh PT ABC.
PT ABC is a company engaged in the production of fertilizers and ammonia that has a cooperative relationship with Toyo Engineering Corporation (TEC). At the time of reporting the VAT Return for the March 2018 Tax Period, PT ABC did not report the revenue share of the license fee transaction “ACES-21 Process” received from TEC amounting to IDR 15,847,669,350, so that the tax authorities made corrections to the transaction. There was a difference of opinion between PT ABC and the tax authorities regarding the object of VAT on exports, so PT ABC decided to file an appeal. The purpose of writing this final project is to describe the process of resolving tax disputes through appeals at the Tax Court. The research methods used by the author are interviews, observation, documentation, and literature study. The author analyzes the data using the qualitative decisive method. The results of PT ABC's appeal were fully granted by the Panel of Judges based on the research of supporting document evidence and responses submitted by PT ABC.
URI: http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/154109
Appears in Collections:UT - Accounting

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cover_J0314201162_22fe6d6ee3e04b30834f255acbd113cd.pdfCover958.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
fulltext_J0314201162_6679f03f297d4919851119e4ec0e57b6.pdf
  Restricted Access
Fulltext1.36 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
lampiran_J0314201162_976500c9e40b4fb2817c41eb63782460.pdf
  Restricted Access
Lampiran1.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.