DSpace JSPUI
DSpace preserves and enables easy and open access to all types of digital content including text, images, moving images, mpegs and data sets
Learn More
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/110841| Title: | Analisis Penerapan Manajemen Agile Pada PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia Divisi Digital Service |
| Authors: | Muljono, Pudji Purwono, Joko Agdaviswan, Azkaa |
| Issue Date: | 23-Nov-2021 |
| Publisher: | IPB University |
| Citation: | Akbar MA, Sang J, Nasrullah, Khan AA, Mahmood S, Qadri SF, Hu H, Xiang H. 2019. Success factors influencing requirements change management process in global software development. Journal of Computer Languages 51(December 2018):p.112–130. Berg V, Birkeland J, Nguyen-Duc A, Pappas IO, Jaccheri L. 2020. Achieving agility and quality in product development - an empirical study of hardware startups. Journal of Systems and Software 167. Bögel P, Pereverza K, Upham P, Kordas O. 2019. Linking socio-technical transition studies and organisational change management: Steps towards an integrative, multi-scale heuristic. Journal of Cleaner Production 232:p.359–368. Bredin K, Söderlund J. 2007. Reconceptualising line management in project-based organisations: The case of competence coaches at Tetra Pak. Personnel Review 36(5):p.815–833. Drury-Grogan ML. 2014. Performance on agile teams: Relating iteration objectives and critical decisions to project management success factors. Information and Software Technology 56(5):p.506–515. El-wakeel F. 2019. FURTHER DEMYSTIFICATION OF AGILE PROJECT MANAGEMENT. Strategic Finance 101(2):p.76–77. Fernandez DJ, Fernandez JD. 2008. Agile project management - Agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems 49(2):p.10–17. Gablas B, Ruzicky E, Ondrouchova M. 2018. The Change in Management Style during then Course of a Project from the Classical to the Agile Approach. Journal of Competitiveness 10(4):p.38–53. Galvan S, Mora M, O’Connor R V., Acosta F, Alvarez F. 2015. A Compliance Analysis of Agile Methodologies with the ISO/IEC 29110 Project Management Process. Procedia Computer Science 64:p.188–195. Ganney PS, Pisharody S, Claridge E. 2013. Software Engineering, Gong Y, Janssen M. 2012. From policy implementation to business process management: Principles for creating flexibility and agility. Government Information Quarterly 29(SUPPL. 1):p.S61–S71. Jerbrant A. 2014. Improving and E mbedding Project M anagement Practices in O rganisations : A M ixed Methodology A pproach. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 2014(17):p.1–19. Kraft C. 2018. Management on Government Finance Projects. The Journal of Government Financial Management 67(1):p.12–18. Kropp M, Meier A, Anslow C, Biddle R. 2020. Satisfaction and its correlates in agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software 164:p.110544. 54 Mansor Z, Yahya S, Arshad NH. 2013. Empirical Study of Cost Management Success Determinants in Agile based Software Development Project: A Rasch Measurement Model Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 107:p.129–135. De Melo CO, S. Cruzes D, Kon F, Conradi R. 2013. Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Information and Software Technology 55(2):p.412–427. Mergel I. 2016. Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly 33(3):p.516–523. Parker, D., Verlinden, A., Nussey, R., Ford, M., & Pathak RD. 2013. Critical evaluation of project-based performance management. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 62(1):p.407–419. Pedersen M. 2013. A quantitative examination of critical success factors comparing agile and waterfall project management methodologies. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses (September):p.189. Rao P, Qiao L, Yang Z. 2016. Preparation of Papers for IFAC Conferences & Symposia: A framework of agile data management in product lifecycle based on rapid data view transformation. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49(12):p.1596–1601. Sandria, F. 2021. Gokil! Telkom Cetak Laba Rp 12,45 T di Semester I-2021. CNBC Indonesia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20210831090109-17- 272469/gokil-telkom-cetak-laba-rp-1245-t-di-semester-i-2021 Schuh G, Gartzen T, Soucy-Bouchard S, Basse F. 2017. Enabling Agility in Product Development through an Adaptive Engineering Change Management. Procedia CIRP 63:p.342–347. Shameem M, Kumar RR, Nadeem M, Khan AA. 2020. Taxonomical classification of barriers for scaling agile methods in global software development environment using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing Journal 90:p.106122. Stachowiak A, Hadaś Ł, Cyplik P, Fertsch M. 2013. Decision model for sustainable and agile resources management. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC PapersOnline) 46(9):p.1140–1145. Takeuchi H, Nonaka I. 1986. The new new product development game: Stop running the relay race and take up rugby. Harvard Business Review 64(1):p.137–147. Thesing T, Feldmann C, Burchardt M. 2021. Agile versus Waterfall Project Management: Decision Model for Selecting the Appropriate Approach to a Project. Procedia Computer Science 181:746–756. Wareza, M. 2020. Tumbuh 3,5%, Telkom Raih Laba Bersih 2019 Rp 18,66 T. CNBC Indonesia: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20200526180259-17- 161027/tumbuh-35-telkom-raih-laba-bersih-2019-rp-1866-t Winby S, Worley CG. 2014. Management processes for agility, speed, and innovation. Organizational Dynamics 43(3):p.225–234. |
| Abstract: | PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia adalah Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang bergerak di bidang telekomunikasi dan teknologi informasi. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi penerapan metode manajemen pasca perpindahan dari metode manajemen tradisional (Waterfall) dan setelah penerapan metode manajemen agile. Sampel dalam penelitian ini adalah karyawan PT. Telekomunikasi Indonesia Divisi Digital Service dengan posisi jabatan Officer 2 dan pengambilan sampel menggunakan kuesioner yang diuji validitasnya dengan Kendall’s W dan dengan responden sejumlah 19 responden. Metode analisis menggunakan Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP) dan pengujian hipotesis dilakukan menggunakan MATLAB. Penelitian menggunakan kriteria kategori atas Sumber Daya Manusia (SDM), kordinasi, teknologi, manajemen proyek dan metodologi perangkat lunak. Pada tahap selanjutnya dari setiap kategori akan dianalis setiap faktor yang mempengaruhi kategori tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kategori SDM menjadi kategori yang sangat berpengaruh pada penerapan masing masing metode manajemen, baik metode manajemen tradisional (Waterfall) dan metode manajemen agile. |
| URI: | http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/110841 |
| Appears in Collections: | MT - Economic and Management |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cover.pdf Restricted Access | Cover | 484.67 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| ANALISIS PENERAPAN MANAJEMEN AGILE PADA PT TELEKOMUNIKASI INDONESIA DIVISI DIGITAL SERVICE - FINAL (2).pdf Restricted Access | Fullteks | 12.37 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| Lampiran.pdf Restricted Access | Lampiran | 625.49 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.