Study of Landscape Ecodesign in Urban Settlement
View/ Open
Date
2013Author
Pratiwi, Vina
Gunawan, Andi
Fatimah, Indung Sitti
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Settlement is important because it became one of basic human needs. Settlement need in Indonesia has reached 13,2 million units. On the other hand, settlement is the cause of 20% building emissions, 40% of greenhouse gases producer, caused 40% of national energy consumption and 12% water consumption. Harmony between building and environment become important which encouraging fossils and energy saving. These condition become basis of ecological movement recently. Settlement is also experiencing ecological movement through fulfillment in renewable way, so settlement developed in ecological concept. The examined issues in this study were whether settlement in ecological concept has applied it and became ecologically, critical component and standard criteria also need to be examined. Therefore, this study has two objectives; (1) Identifying and testing critical components of landscape ecodesign in urban settlement through expert judgement, (2) determinating the ideal standard criteria of landscape ecodesign in urban settlement, and applicate standard criteria by assessing two test-case settlement. This study showed, the alternative priorities of landscape ecodesign in urban settlement sequentially was public participation (38,4%), site design (35,9%), and institutional (25,7%). Public participation was major driver to embody ecodesign concept. Besides, critical component of landscape ecodesign in urban settlement sequentially were water (29,6%), land use (26,7%), human behavior (14,7%), institution (10,8%), physical settlement (10,0%), and technology (8,2%). This preference results were in good consistency level, with 3% inconsistency ratio of hierarchy. Standard criteria consists of six components, sixteen subcomponents, and parameters were set according related literature. Ecodesign concept at two test-case settlement were in moderate level (score of 2,50 to 4,98). These results indicate both of regions were still not fully implemented ecodesign and need to improve some parameters. The parameters are availability of local institution, accessibility to public facilities, use of natural force, use of local softmaterial, and eco-properties certification.
Collections
- MT - Agriculture [3708]