Environmental Management in Fishing Port Case Study in: Pelabuhan Perikanan Nusantara Palabuhanratu

Abstract

Increasing amount of production and number of fishing vessel into the fishing port positively correlation with increased potential of waste generated, arising from land based activities and marine activities. Land activities activities include originating from the office, manufacturing and/or repair of boats and nets, stalls and shops as well as industrial activities and so on. Several objectives of this study are 1) Get an overview of the implementation of environmental management mechanism in PPN Palabuhanratu both technically, and social institutions; 2) Knowing the status of water quality in the PPN Palabuhanratu; 3) Formulating waste management strategies in PPN Palabuhanratu. To obtain this goal is the method used purposive sampling method through direct field observation, in-depth interviews with actors port activities, related literature, documentation and analysis of data used is the SWOT. Observations on environmental management facilities in accordance with the PPN Palabuhanratu not necessary as presented in the existing legislation. PPN Palabuhanratu, do not have adequate waste management facilities such as a waste water treatment plant (IPAL) and reception facilities. Existing of waste management facilities in PPN Palabuhanratu are trash bins, container of used oil, temporary trash container and trash hauler unit. Wastes generated from 1) Activities office which includes domestic waste as well as organic and inorganic, hazardous and toxic waste (B3) generated from office activity that uses a number of office equipment such as paper, printer and lighting facilities; 2) Activities added which includes washing vessel anchoring, hatch, Bilge water discharge vessel and packaging waste and leftover supplies that are not used; 3) fish landings and sales activities of the catch which includes waste water ice is used as a pickling fish, cleaning fish and fish waste itself coming into port through the drainage pond, 4) supplies replenishment activities which include waste from spills of oil and / or oil, leftover bait fish fillet results in the form of fish heads and bones ± 50% of the number of fish used for bait are generally discharged directly into in the port basin; 5) Activity repair /ship building (docking) and repair nets which includes domestic waste from workshop workers, waste used oil, scrap metal, rags and scrap material; 6) Activity Store (shop) which includes a waste leftovers , packaging waste and waste drainage from washing / kitchen activities; 7) industrial activities that include domestic waste from activities worker accommodation, ice from fish waste, building waste drainage and leaching residual waste packaging materials. These wastes have an impact on water quality and sediment in the port basin with implications for community water biota (plankton and benthos). Based on the analysis carried out (sample observations at several stations) there are some physical and chemical parameters that do not meet environmental standards, which include brightness, solid waste, odor, presence of oil sheens as well as high levels of ammonia. Determination of status of water quality used method “Indeks Pencemaran (IP)” and STORET water quality at ST.1, who was on the scene ST.3 port basin II and ST. 4 outside the port basin infered the light weight contaminated category. Meanwhile ST.5 ST.6 and ST.7 located in port basin I in moderate pollution category. The parameter value exceeds the quality standards calculated with IP and STORET are ammonia and brightness. Sediment analysis results indicate the condition of the substrate is sand clay, loam and sandy loam. Based on the Krauskopt consensus, concentration of copper (Cu), Lead (Pb) and Zinc (Zn) exceed the reference value. This condition is closely related to the existing activity around port which repair and/or maintenance of the ship, industry, activity, trade and shopping area. Based on plankton indentification, dominant presence is from centric diatom and cilliate which is indicating stress to the environment (Verlecar et al., 2006). Based on SWOT analysis by identification of internal and external factor, direction for environment management strategy in PPN Palabuhanratu are: 1) Strategy SO (implementation K3 procedure and K5 programs, facilities and optimizing existing janitor, give rewards to people who commit environmental management); 2) WO Strategy (Procurement of waste management facilities, implementation, supervision and monitoring of environmental management, organization and implementation SOP establishment of environmental management at the port); 3) ST Strategy (Maximizing function janitor port, socialization to the community the importance of environmental management port, standard Socialization Program K3 and K5), and 4) WT Strategy (placement and provision of waste containment facilities tailored to the port community activity center, planning environmental management program early, enforcement fines and penalties for people who dump waste carelessly).