Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/166019Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | Warsiki, Endang | - |
| dc.contributor.author | HANDAYANI, ALIEFYA SIWI | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-28T07:43:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-28T07:43:00Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/166019 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Penentuan bilangan asam (acid value) merupakan parameter penting dalam menilai kualitas minyak goreng bekas pakai yang digunakan dalam proses produksi mie instan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan dua metode analisis yang umum digunakan, yaitu metode AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) dan AOCS (American Oil Chemists’ Society), dalam pengujian bilangan asam minyak goreng bekas pakai dari proses produksi mie instan. Analisis dilakukan dengan lima kali pengulangan untuk masing-masing metode terhadap sampel yang sama. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa kedua metode memberikan nilai bilangan asam yang relatif serupa, dengan rata-rata masing-masing 0,170% untuk metode AOAC dan 0,174% untuk metode AOCS. Uji t berpasangan menunjukkan tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan secara statistik antara kedua metode (p = 0,178). Evaluasi efektivitas dengan menggunakan metode pairwise comparison menunjukkan bahwa metode AOAC menunjukkan efisiensi lebih tinggi dari segi waktu dan biaya operasional, sedangkan metode AOCS lebih unggul dalam akurasi dan spesifisitas. Oleh karena itu, pemilihan metode disarankan disesuaikan dengan kebutuhan laboratorium, baik untuk keperluan analisis cepat maupun verifikasi mutu yang lebih ketat. | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The determination of acid value is a critical parameter in assessing the quality of the frying oil used in instant noodle production. This study aims to compare two commonly used analytical methods, AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists) and AOCS (American Oil Chemists’ Society), in determining the acid value of used frying oil. Each method was tested five times on the same oil sample. The results showed a similar acid value between the methods, with averages of 0.170% for AOAC and 0.174% for AOCS. A paired t-test revealed no statistically significant difference (p = 0.178) between the two methods. A pairwise comparison analysis indicated that the AOAC method is more efficient regarding time and cost, while the AOCS method is superior in accuracy and specificity. Consequently, method selection should be tailored to the laboratory’s needs, considering whether the priority is rapid analysis or higher quality verification for compliance with international standards. | - |
| dc.description.sponsorship | null | - |
| dc.language.iso | id | - |
| dc.publisher | IPB University | id |
| dc.title | Evaluasi Bilangan Asam Minyak Bekas Pakai dengan Metode AOAC dan AOCS | id |
| dc.title.alternative | Evaluation of Acid Value Analysis on Used Oil Samples with AOAC and AOCS Methods | - |
| dc.type | Tugas Akhir | - |
| dc.subject.keyword | acid value | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | Frying oil | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | Instant noodles | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | t-test | id |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pairwise Comparison | id |
| Appears in Collections: | UT - Supervisor of Food Quality Assurance | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| cover_J0305211122_228115a3e86e4e1cb6bc22c40b0bda11.pdf | Cover | 6.21 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| fulltext_J0305211122_043b55f139354b3d8cf8a6611562264f.pdf Restricted Access | Fulltext | 6.86 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
| lampiran_J0305211122_a16ca8b62db149ada84a7fbf6deb93f7.pdf Restricted Access | Lampiran | 6.14 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.